Gaylord Chemical Co. LLC

9 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 709 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 263 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Gomez-Garcia v. Sessions
861 F.3d 730 (8th Cir. 2017) Cited 7 times
Affirming the BIA's conclusion that the applicant's political affiliation was not central because "[t]here [was] no evidence in the record that MS-13 threatened [the applicants] before they reported [the gang's] burglary"
Spurlino Materials, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
645 F.3d 870 (7th Cir. 2011) Cited 8 times
Establishing new employee evaluation system was mandatory subject of bargaining
N.L.R.B. v. Rock Bottom Stores, Inc.
51 F.3d 366 (2d Cir. 1995) Cited 7 times
Finding in relocation cases courts look "to evidence regarding the continuity of the bargaining unit and the employer's operations in order to determine whether the contract should bar a representation election at the new location"
Westwood Import Co. Inc. v. N.L.R.B
681 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 14 times
In Westwood Import, the court did not discuss how distance factored into its analysis, but relied upon Tricor Products, Inc., 239 NLRB 65, 68 (1978).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 3 times 3 Legal Analyses
No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,307 times 84 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Gaylord Chemical Co. LLC

9 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Affirming the BIA's conclusion that the applicant's political affiliation was not central because "[t]here [was] no evidence in the record that MS-13 threatened [the applicants] before they reported [the gang's] burglary"

Establishing new employee evaluation system was mandatory subject of bargaining

Finding in relocation cases courts look "to evidence regarding the continuity of the bargaining unit and the employer's operations in order to determine whether the contract should bar a representation election at the new location"

In Westwood Import, the court did not discuss how distance factored into its analysis, but relied upon Tricor Products, Inc., 239 NLRB 65, 68 (1978).

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355