§

Garage Management Corp.

334 N.L.R.B. 940 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Garage Management Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 976 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 204 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    843 F.2d 285 (8th Cir. 1988)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that the restoration order was not unduly burdensome where it "would not require capital investment disproportionate to [the employer's] resources or impose substantial, continuing losses"

  5. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  6. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 Affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    973 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Affirming the Board's imposition of attorney's fees from the time at which the arbitration became unlawful