§
Gabel Tank Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,658 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    339 F.2d 829 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    No. 21204. January 5, 1965. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Jean Allard, Chicago, Ill., for respondents, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., of counsel. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Chief Judge. The Board seeks enforcement

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southern Desk Co.

    246 F.2d 53 (4th Cir. 1957)   Cited 1 times

    No. 7405. Argued June 5, 1957. Decided July 2, 1957. William W. Watson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel., Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Young M. Smith, Hickory, N.C. (Blakeney Alexander, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and SOBELOFF, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a