§

G. W. Murphy Industries

182 N.L.R.B. 158 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
G. W. Murphy Industries

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. P. Lorillard Co.

    314 U.S. 512 (1942)   Cited 76 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued December 18, 19, 1941. Decided January 5, 1942. Whether an employer should be required to bargain with a union previously selected as employees' bargaining representative or, in view of lapse of time and changed conditions, a new election should be held is a question for decision by the Board and not by the Circuit Court of Appeals. P. 513. 117 F.2d 921, reversed. CERTIORARI, 313 U.S. 557, to review a judgment entered

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Zelrich Company

    344 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 50 times

    No. 21482. May 11, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1965. Thomas Canafax, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Anthony J. Obadal, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Warren Whitham, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board,

  7. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 131 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 31 times
    In Southwestern Portland Cement Company v. N.L.R.B., 407 F.2d 131 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 820, 90 S.Ct. 59, 24 L.Ed.2d 71 (1969), we held that affidavits submitted by a company to the Regional Director in conjunction with an investigation were part of the record under § 102.68 as it then read.

  8. Home Town Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 392 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Denying enforcement

  9. Polymers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    In Polymers, the National Labor Relations Board and the court found the remote possibility of tampering insufficient to invalidate an election.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. American Cable Systems, Inc.

    414 F.2d 661 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 24 times
    In American Cable, this court, interpreting Gissel just a month after it was decided, required that the Board make specific findings that the union had a card majority, that the unfair labor practices were "serious and extensive," that traditional remedies would be unlikely to insure a fair election, and that the employees' interests would be best served by a bargaining order.