§
FSI

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 48 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Goodless Bros. Elec. Co., Inc.

    285 F.3d 102 (1st Cir. 2002)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "vacate" as "to render inoperative; deprive of validity; void; annul" and that an order to vacate "wipes the slate clean"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Goodless Elec. Co.

    124 F.3d 322 (1st Cir. 1997)   Cited 9 times
    Reading Board precedent to require that "when a union claims it has attained majority status and the parties, based on that claim, agree to a Section 9 relationship, the employer must challenge that status within a reasonable period of time (six months), or be bound by its agreement"