§

Fred Meyer Stores

354 NLRB No. 127 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Fred Meyer Stores

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 293 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions

  3. Snell Island SNF LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations Board, 568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009), we held that two Board members may exercise the Board's authority in such circumstances as a quorum of a three-member delegate group, overridden that holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 2400089 (2010).

  4. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 15 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.

  5. Northeastern Land v. National Labor Relations

    560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."

  6. Winkie Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    348 F.3d 254 (7th Cir. 2003)

    No. 03-1576, 03-1894. Argued September 26, 2003. Decided October 27, 2003. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 13-CA-40451. Julian D. Schreiber (argued), Borovsky Ehrlich, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Julie B. Broido (argued), Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC; Elizabeth Kinney, Chicago, IL; and Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Before