Fox Television Stations, LLC

10 Cited authorities

  1. St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable
  2. Specialty Tires v. CIT Group/Equi. Fina

    248 F.3d 1131 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 35 times
    Denying request to inspect grand jury voting record when the defendant failed to demonstrate a "particularized need"
  3. Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 30 times
    Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances
  4. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"
  5. Taylor Warehouse v. National Labor Relations

    98 F.3d 892 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "credibility determinations made by . . . administrative law judge and adopted by the [National Labor Relations Board] (NLRB) are entitled to great weight"
  6. Automotive Council v. N.L.R.B

    483 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices
  7. Intermountain Rural Elec. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    984 F.2d 1562 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding of fait accompli because employer had implemented unilateral change in policy before union received notice of change
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Regency Heritage Nursing & Rehab. Ctr.

    657 F. App'x 129 (3d Cir. 2016)

    No. 15-1883 08-16-2016 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. REGENCY HERITAGE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, Respondent RENDELL, Circuit Judge NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Petition for Review for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB-1:22-CA-074343) Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on April 6, 2016 Before: FISHER, RENDELL, and BARRY, Circuit Judges OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Triple A Fire Protection, Inc.

    136 F.3d 727 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 14 times
    Finding per se violation of the NLRA's prohibition against direct dealing where employer "deal[t] directly with employees outside the normal channels of collective bargaining" in an attempt "to dissuade employees from supporting the union and create incentives for them to abandon their support for the union"
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second