§

Foodbasket Partners

344 N.L.R.B. 799 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Foodbasket Partners

20 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,553 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Morton v. Mancari

    417 U.S. 535 (1974)   Cited 1,365 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Indian Commerce Clause empowers Congress to “single Indians out as a proper subject for separate legislation.”

  3. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  4. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.

    454 U.S. 170 (1981)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Hendricks, the Supreme Court approved the Board's "labor-nexus" rule as determinative of whether or not a worker is to be deemed a confidential employee.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jonas (In re Bel Air Chateau Hospital, Inc.)

    611 F.2d 1248 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 77-1556, 77-3639. December 12, 1979. Michael D. Stein, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Martin J. Brill, Robinson Wolas, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WRIGHT and TANG, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. The Honorable Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, NLRB v. FDI, Inc., No

  8. Ninth Ave. Remedial Group v. Allis-Chalmers, (N.D.Ind. 1996)

    195 B.R. 716 (N.D. Ind. 1996)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that material questions existed on both the "mere continuation" and "substantial continuity" exceptions so as to preclude summary judgment on plaintiff's successor liability claim

  9. Sullivan Industries v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 890 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 29 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Refusing to enforce the Board's order requiring a successor employer to bargain with a union because "the Board ha[d] not explained why an affirmative bargaining order—with its corresponding decertification bar—[was] the appropriate remedy in th[at] case"

  10. In re Goodman

    873 F.2d 598 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the question of whether an employer is an alter ego of a prior employer for purposes of liability under the Act is a "question of substantive federal labor law" to be determined by the Board

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,307 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355