§

Food Services of America, Inc., a subsidiary of Services Group of America, Inc.

360 N.L.R.B. 1012 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Food Services of America, Inc., a subsidiary of Services Group of America, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Stephens Media, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    677 F.3d 1241 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 17 times
    Applying the Bennett standard to cross-petitions for enforcement and review under Section 10(e) and 10(f)

  3. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  4. Ryder Truck Rental v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that an employer's explanation that it discharged an employee because the employee falsified maintenance reports was pretextual because the employer had never discharged other employees based on this offense and the employer had instructed employees to falsify maintenance reports

  5. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  6. Nevada Service Emp. Union v. N.L.R.B

    358 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-70234, 08-70793, 08-71242. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2009. Filed November 17, 2009. Glenn Rothner, Esquire, Lisa Demidovich, Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Cornele A. Overstreet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Joel C. Schochet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Las Vegas, NV, Regional Director, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, CA, Raymond Carey, Foley Lardner, LLP, Detroit, MI, for Respondent. Christopher

  7. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  8. Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 11 times

    No. 85-1475. August 25, 1987. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on respondent's petition for rehearing. Timothy J. O'Rourke, Marshall F. Berman and Michael A. Pace, Washington, D.C., were on petitioner's response to the petition for rehearing. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MIKVA and BORK, Circuit