§

First American Enterprises d/b/a Heritage Lakeside

369 N.L.R.B. 54 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
First American Enterprises d/b/a Heritage Lakeside

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 90 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Long Island Ass'n for Aids Care, Inc.

    870 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2017)   Cited 2 times

    Docket Nos. 16-2325-ag(L) 16-2782-ag(XAP) August Term, 2017. 08-31-2017 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner–Cross–Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND ASSOCIATION FOR AIDS CARE, INC., Respondent–Cross–Petitioner. David R. Ehrlich, Stagg, Terenzi, Confusione & Wabnik, LLP (Debra L. Wabnik, on the brief), Garden City, NY. for Respondent–Cross–Petitioner Long Island Association for AIDS Care, Inc. Ruth E. Burdick, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board (Julie Broido, Supervisory

  4. United Food Commercial Workers v. N.L.R.B

    447 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that stating "I'm just tired of this Union shit and I'm ready to get my company back where it belong" two days before firing a union election observer "exhibits powerful antiunion animus"

  5. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    301 F.3d 167 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding unlawful polling when employees were solicited to appear in an anti-union film

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    257 F. App'x 642 (4th Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 06-1881, 06-1917. Argued September 25, 2007. Decided December 7, 2007. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (9-CA-40915; 9-CA41191; 9-CA-41291; 9-CA-41338). ARGUED: Grant T. Pecor, Nantz, Litowich, Smith, Girard Hamilton, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for SNE Enterprises, Inc. David A. Seid, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. ON BRIEF: Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy

  8. Texaco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    700 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 5 times
    Enforcing Board's ruling that failure to state opposition to strike by workers on disability leave cannot lead to termination of benefits