§

FARM FRESH COMPANY TARGET ONE, LLC

361 N.L.R.B. 848 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
FARM FRESH COMPANY TARGET ONE, LLC

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.

    364 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 395 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

  7. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  8. Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. National Labor rel

    515 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    No. 05-75515. Argued and Submitted October 16, 2007. Filed January 28, 2008. Kristin Martin (argued), Richard G. McCracken, Davis, Cowell, Bowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Brian Herman (argued), Mark J. Ricciardi, Fisher Phillips, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for intervenor Reorganized Aladdin Gaming, LLC. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor

  9. Overnite Transp. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 2002)   Cited 9 times
    Finding proper a wage increase that was awarded after the majority of elections had already been held

  10. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  11. Section 274a.2 - Verification of identity and employment authorization

    8 C.F.R. § 274a.2   Cited 85 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Establishing Form I–9