§

Endo Painting Service Inc.

360 N.L.R.B. 485 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Endo Painting Service Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  4. Soc'y of Prof'l Eng'g Emps. in Aerospace v. Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.

    Case No. 12-1180-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2012)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 12-1180-JTM 11-30-2012 SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES IN AEROSPACE, LOCAL 2001, INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES, Plaintiff, v. SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS, INC, Defendant. J. THOMAS MARTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This action is before the court on competing motions for summary judgment by Spirit Aerosystems, Inc., and one of its unions, the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace, Local 2001 International Federation of Professional and

  5. West Penn Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 03-1984, 03-2139. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: January 12, 2005. Petition for review of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Clark Unkovic, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for West Penn Power Company, Potomac Edison Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, Office of the General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Burton E. Rosenthal, Segal, Roitman Coleman, Boston, Massachusetts, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF:

  6. Square D Company v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18700. May 4, 1964. Foley, Sammond Lardner, James I. Poole, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Margaret M. Farmer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before POPE, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on petition of Square D Company (herein called the Company) to review and set aside an order

  7. Section 173 - Functions of Service

    29 U.S.C. § 173   Cited 380 times
    Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."