§

Encino Hospital Medical Center- Prime

360 N.L.R.B. 335 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Encino Hospital Medical Center- Prime

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

  3. Int'l Union v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    No. 06-2156. Submitted: September 14, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 28, 2008. ON BRIEF: Bruce A. Miller, Robert P. Fetter, Miller Cohen, Detroit, Michigan, for Petitioners. Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert J. Englehart, Gregory P. Lauro, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Sean F. Crotty, Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn, Detroit, Michigan, for Intervenor. Before: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges. GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which NORRIS

  4. Roadmaster Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    874 F.2d 448 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 24 times
    In Roadmaster Corp. v. NLRB, 874 F.2d 448, 451-54 (7th Cir.1989), the Seventh Circuit held that a union official who signed an employee's name to a grievance without the employee's permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA. More recently, in OPW Fueling Components v. NLRB, 443 F.3d 490, 493-97 (6th Cir.2006), the Sixth Circuit held that a union official who signed the names of two involuntarily transferred employees to a grievance without their permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA.

  5. OPW Fueling Components v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    443 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 04-2563, 05-1083. Argued: November 28, 2005. Decided and Filed: April 6, 2006. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc, July 28, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Michael W. Hawkins, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Michael W. Hawkins, Colleen P. Lewis, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, Aileen A. Armstrong, Jill A. Griffin

  6. Holsum de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.3d 265 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 3 times
    Finding substantial evidence of knowledge of union activities conducted in plain view in an open parking lot where the activities "could very well have been observed by any number of supervisors and managers"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Igramo Enterprise, Inc.

    310 F. App'x 452 (2d Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-1861-ag (L), 08-2207-ag. February 18, 2009. Petition for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. John Diviney (Alan B. Pearl and Siam Asad Ali, on the brief), Alan B. Pearl Associates, Syosset, NY, for Petitioner. Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory Attorney (Jeffrey L. Horowitz, Attorney, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson