Electrical Workers, Local 453

12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Utah Constr. Co.

    384 U.S. 394 (1966)   Cited 1,247 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts can give preclusive effect to certain administrative proceedings
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency
  3. Safir v. Gibson

    432 F.2d 137 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that a Federal Maritime Commission decision was entitled to preclusive effect, noting the FMC's expertise and that the issues "were fully litigated before the agency designated to determine them"
  4. General Ser. Emp. U. Local No. 73 v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 19 times
    Discussing threats, but not statutes of limitations
  5. Mosher Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    568 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times
    Approving application of collateral estoppel to facts previously adjudicated in a labor dispute before an ALJ
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    604 F.2d 1091 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 265, 604 F.2d 1091, 1097 (8th Cir. 1979), under circumstances clearly analogous to those involved in the present case, this court addressed the issue of proscribed recognitional picketing under Section 8(b)(7)(A), and the exception to that section for "area standards" picketing.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, Int. Bro. of Teamsters

    314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 224, Docket 27524. Argued December 4, 1962. Decided January 28, 1963. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., Attys.), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., submitted brief for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  8. Whitman Elec. Inc. v. Local 363, Int. Bro. of Elec.

    398 F. Supp. 1218 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)   Cited 10 times

    No. 72 CIV. 4078. June 5, 1974. Supplemental Opinion September 9, 1974. James J. Ryan, Albany, N. Y., for plaintiff. Richard W. Rosen, New City, N. Y., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER MOTLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Whitman Electric, Inc., has brought this action against Local 363, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, pursuant to Section 303 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 187(b) for recovery of damages resulting from an alleged secondary boycott

  9. Congress of Independent Unions v. N.L.R.B

    620 F.2d 172 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 79-1719, 79-1914. Submitted March 12, 1980. Decided April 11, 1980. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1980. Gary T. Nelms, Jones, Karchmer, Nelms, Sullivan, Springfield, Mo., for Southern. Gerald R. Walters, Hoagland, Maucker, Bernard Almeter, Alton, III., for Congress of Independant Unions. Barbara A. Atkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B., Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Allen, Acting

  10. Southern Sun Elec. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    620 F.2d 170 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    No. 79-1923. Submitted March 12, 1980. Decided April 11, 1980. Gary T. Nelms, Jones, Keeter, Karchmer, Nelms Sullivan, Springfield, Mo., for petitioner. Barbara A. Atkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Howard E. Perlstein, Morton Namrow, Attys., Norton J. Come, Acting Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Petition for review of decision