Eklund's Sweden House Inn, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,033 times 66 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 709 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 251 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Daisy's Originals, Inc. of Miami v. N.L.R.B
468 F.2d 493 (5th Cir. 1972) Cited 12 times
In Daisy's Originals, Inc. of Miami v. NLRB, 468 F.2d 493, 501 (5th Cir. 1972), the court did apply the Bryan Manufacturing rule to disallow an attack on the union's initial majority when the employer had raised the reasonable doubt defense.
N.L.R.B. v. Cast Optics Corporation
458 F.2d 398 (3d Cir. 1972) Cited 11 times
No. 71-1098. Argued November 11, 1971. Decided March 23, 1972. Charles Steel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Samuel Gruber, Gruber Turkel, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. Joel Ronald Ax, Associate Gen. Counsel, New York City, for intervenor. Before VAN DUSEN and JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT EDWARD R. BECKER,[fn*] District Judge. [fn*] Sitting by designation. I. This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,086 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Eklund's Sweden House Inn, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Daisy's Originals, Inc. of Miami v. N.L.R.B

In Daisy's Originals, Inc. of Miami v. NLRB, 468 F.2d 493, 501 (5th Cir. 1972), the court did apply the Bryan Manufacturing rule to disallow an attack on the union's initial majority when the employer had raised the reasonable doubt defense.

N.L.R.B. v. Cast Optics Corporation

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"