§

E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

355 N.L.R.B. 1096 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Beverly Health Rehab. Serv. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 316 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding no unfairness where the plaintiff “had every incentive to—and did—litigate the issue before the [previous court]”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Hardesty Co., Inc.

    308 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that hardline bargaining positions can be evidence that an employer "had no intention of reaching an agreement"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.

    426 F.3d 455 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 9 times

    No. 05-1061. Submitted September 9, 2005. Decided October 19, 2005. PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Kellie J. Isbell, Attorney, on brief, for petitioner. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer Feld, LLP, Lawrence D. Levien, and Joshua B.

  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  5. Korn Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    389 F.2d 117 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an employer need not produce information that is not available to it for the purpose of supplying the union with information requested

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second