Ecology Services, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 204 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
  4. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hinky Dinky Super Markets

    636 F.2d 231 (8th Cir. 1980)

    No. 80-1327. Submitted December 11, 1980. Decided December 22, 1980. Steven M. Fetter, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Verne Moore, Jr., Omaha, Neb., for respondent. Before HEANEY, ROSS and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has applied to this court for enforcement of a bargaining order which was issued following findings that Hinky Dinky Super Markets, Inc. (Hinky Dinky) had violated various sections of the National Labor Relations Act (the

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,307 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355