Eastgate I.G.A. Foodliner

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 505 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  3. Associated Press v. Labor Board

    301 U.S. 103 (1937)   Cited 257 times
    Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.

    325 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 29 times

    No. 15180. December 11, 1963. William J. Avrutis, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, on the brief), for petitioner. George N. Bashara, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for respondents. Before WEICK and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and DARR, Senior District Judge. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc., referred to herein as "Elias," sells and distributes in the Detroit area several restaurant

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Winkel Motors, Inc.

    443 F.2d 38 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 25904. May 27, 1971. William F. Wachter (argued), Daniel M. Katz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jack I. McAuliffe (argued), of Streeter, Sala McAuliffe, Reno, Nev., John D. Foote, Regional Office of Intl. Assn. of Machinists Aerospace Workers, Burlingame, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New England Web, Inc.

    309 F.2d 696 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    No. 5988. Heard October 4, 1962. Decided November 13, 1962. Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Owen P. Reid, Providence, R.I., with whom Robert J. McGarry and Graham, Reid, Ewing Stapleton, Providence, R.I., were on brief, for respondents. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge,

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 20, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Bird Machine Company for an enforcement of an order of the board. Decree enforcing order of board granted. Owsley Vose, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushein, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frances Lopinsky, all of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  10. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment