§

East End Bus Lines, Inc.

366 N.L.R.B. 180 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
East End Bus Lines, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  3. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. CNN Am., Inc.

    865 F.3d 740 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 14 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Declining to enforce a Board order that "appear[ed] to be inconsistent with its precedents, without addressing those precedents or explaining why they do not govern"

  5. Chevron Mining, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    684 F.3d 1318 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 19 times
    Reexamining precedent in light of recent Supreme Court decisions and reaching the same conclusion

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

  7. Torrington Extend-A-Care Emp. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    17 F.3d 580 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that Board could rely on circumstantial evidence to establish one person's knowledge of another's union activities

  8. Autonation, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 7 times
    Finding employer's claim that it fired employee due to job abandonment to be a pretext because employer knew that employee had filed for unemployment benefits and was under the impression that he had already been terminated and yet the company did nothing to correct the employee's alleged misimpression

  9. Bellagio, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    854 F.3d 703 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting the Board's finding of unlawful surveillance when a supervisor briefly observed and followed an employee in a well-trafficked area during the supervisor's regular job duties

  10. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience