§

East Belden Corp.

239 N.L.R.B. 776 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
East Belden Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Tom-A-Hawk Transit, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 1025 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 17450. December 19, 1969. Joseph H. Barnett, Gary K. Mickey, Aurora, Ill., for petitioner; O'Brien, Burnell, Puckett Barnett, Aurora, Ill., of counsel. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Susan J. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SWYGERT and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges, and WILL, District Judge. Judge Hubert L. Will is sitting by designation

  4. Burns I. Detective Ag. v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times
    In Burns, the duty to bargain did not mature until late June, at the point when it became clear that the successor had hired the requisite complement of his predecessor's employees.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  6. Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    540 F.2d 841 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 6 times
    In Spitzer, this Court noted that the Second Circuit, in defining the perfectly clear successor exception, relied on the NLRB's decision in Spruce Up Corp., 209 NLRB No. 19 (1974).

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pine Valley Div. of Ethan Allen

    544 F.2d 742 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 4 times

    No. 75-2339. Argued June 9, 1976. Decided November 8, 1976. Aileen Armstrong, N.L.R.B. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., John H. Ferguson, Sandra Shands Elligers, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief, for petitioner. J. W. Alexander, Jr., (John O. Pollard, Blakeney, Alexander and Machen, on brief) Charlotte, N.C., for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BUTZNER and WIDENER, Circuit Judges. HAYNSWORTH

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.

    468 F.2d 963 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 7 times
    In NLRB v. Bachrodt Chevrolet Co., 468 F.2d 963 (7th Cir. 1972), vacated and remanded, 411 U.S. 912, 93 S.Ct. 1547, 36 L.Ed.2d 304, on remand, 205 N.L.R.B. 784 (1973), enforced, 515 F.2d 512 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 274, 46 L.Ed.2d 255 (1975), the court approved the Board's determination of unlawful unilateral action when an employer manifested a purpose to hire his predecessor's employees without contemporaneously advising them of plans to change working conditions and thereafter fixed working conditions different from those of the predecessor.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Valleydale Packers

    402 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 8 times

    No. 25584. November 7, 1968. Rehearing Denied February 26, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Jeffrey G. Spragens, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C., Asa Ambrister, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Circuit Judge, and FISHER, District Judge. PER CURIAM: In this Labor Board

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Lunder Shoe Corp.

    211 F.2d 284 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4774. March 15, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and Bernard Dunau, Samuel M. Singer, and Wiley M. Craft, Washington, D.C., Attorneys on brief), for petitioner. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass. (Gordon Epstein, Boston, Mass., on brief), for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board