§

Durham School Services

360 N.L.R.B. 851 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Durham School Services

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 258 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  2. St. Margaret Memorial Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    991 F.2d 1146 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that a "closer scrutiny" of any objection to an election is required where "a swing of two votes would have changed the result"

  3. U-Haul Company of Nv. v. Nat. Labor Rel.

    490 F.3d 957 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 6 times
    Affirming the Board's determination that “allegedly forged signatures, which suggested more employees supported the Union than may have been the case, would not have prevented employees from recognizing that the Union was circulating the petition to garner support for its cause”

  4. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984), we stated "[t]here may be cases where no forgery can be proved, but where the misrepresentation is so pervasive and the deception so artful that employees will be unable to separate truth from untruth and where their right to a free and fair choice will be affected."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. E.A. Sween Co.

    640 F.3d 781 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 2 times

    No. 10-3639. Argued April 15, 2011. Decided May 16, 2011. Linda Dreeben, Attorney, Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Christopher W. Young, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Scott V. Kamins, Attorney, Offit Kurman, Maple Lawn, MD, for Respondent. Before POSNER and MANION, Circuit Judges, and LEFKOW, District Judge. The Honorable Joan Humphrey Lefkow of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. LEFKOW,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Best Products Co., Inc.

    765 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 23 times
    In Best Products we stated that "while the court is not bound by the Board's view on retroactive application, it should defer to those views absent manifest injustice."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Semco Printing Center, Inc.

    721 F.2d 886 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that where witness has put precise language in doubt, the trier of fact is entitled to consider all of the witness' recollections

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gormac Custom Manufacturing, Inc.

    190 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 4 times
    In Gormac, the union had circulated a vote yes petition in the employer's offices three hours before the election, and the court ruled that the Board had abused its discretion in denying a pre-certification hearing.

  9. Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    714 F.2d 1042 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    In Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 714 F.2d 1042, 1052-1060 (11th Cir. 1983), the court approved both Midland and its general retroactive application, but balked at resolving whether to apply the doctrine retroactively to the case before it, which had been decided by the Board under the Hollywood Ceramics/General Knit standard.

  10. Polymers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    In Polymers, the National Labor Relations Board and the court found the remote possibility of tampering insufficient to invalidate an election.