§

DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC, as a successor to E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

369 N.L.R.B. 117 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC, as a successor to E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

13 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 729 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 708 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,496 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  4. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  5. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 267 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Solutia, Inc.

    699 F.3d 50 (1st Cir. 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that “ ‘jurisdictional’ clauses that define the assignment of work to union members ... address a mandatory subject of bargaining”

  7. Power Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    40 F.3d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that coincident timing and uncontested § 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding

  8. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 150-A v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 26 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court may not certify a class without ruling that each Rule 23 requirement is met, even if a requirement overlaps with a merits issue

  9. SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.3d 158 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 11 times
    Affirming the Board's conclusion that the sporadic use of per diem employees for employee shortages was not equivalent to a past practice of subcontracting that would have allowed the defendant hospital to act unilaterally in hiring subcontractors

  10. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs