§

Diamond Properties

02-CA-036783 (N.L.R.B. May. 11, 2006)
Diamond Properties

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  4. Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Collecting standards

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

  6. Banknote America v. National Labor Relations

    84 F.3d 637 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Enforcing Board order requiring employer to bargain with three different units at a printing facility

  7. Saks Co. v. N.L.R.B

    634 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "diminution in unit size is insufficient to rebut the presumption of continued majority status"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Boston Needham Indus. Clean. Co.

    526 F.2d 74 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1074. Argued September 5, 1975. Decided November 13, 1975. Roger T. Brice, Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, were on brief, for petitioner. George F. McInerny, Boston, Mass., with whom Lynch, Welch, Whitney McInerny, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of Maryland