§

DHL Express, Inc.

355 N.L.R.B. 680 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
DHL Express, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Letter Carriers v. Austin

    418 U.S. 264 (1974)   Cited 609 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

  2. Steam Press Holdings v. Hawaii Teamsters

    302 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff estopped from alleging claim for breach of contract, because plaintiff, prior to filing suit, had repudiated contract

  3. Jolliff v. N.L.R.B

    513 F.3d 600 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 24 times
    In Jolliff, we canvassed the tests and approaches of other circuits and created a framework for ascertaining whether a defamatory meaning can be gleaned from the allegedly defamatory statement.

  4. Venetian v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.3d 601 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no unfairness where the court could "discern no difference between the incentives that the [plaintiff] may have had in its Ninth Circuit litigation and its incentives here. The stakes in its attempt before that court were no less than they are now."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    526 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 11 times

    No. 07-14951 Non-Argument Calendar. May 2, 2008. Linda Dreeben, David Habenstreit, Kira Vol, NLRB, Washington, DC, for NLRB. John C. Oldenburg, U.S. Postal Serv., Law Dept., Memphis, TN, for Respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case comes to us on Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board"). The Respondent, the United States Postal Service

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. Nevada Service Emp. Union v. N.L.R.B

    358 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-70234, 08-70793, 08-71242. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2009. Filed November 17, 2009. Glenn Rothner, Esquire, Lisa Demidovich, Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Cornele A. Overstreet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Joel C. Schochet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Las Vegas, NV, Regional Director, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, CA, Raymond Carey, Foley Lardner, LLP, Detroit, MI, for Respondent. Christopher

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second