§

David A. Henery, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

07a50034 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 22, 2005)
David A. Henery, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,663 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,628 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,623 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  4. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.

    424 U.S. 747 (1976)   Cited 1,099 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the interests of "unnamed members of the class" who are entitled to relief may satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement

  5. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,019 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"