§

D & D Sewing Co.

277 N.L.R.B. 909 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
D & D Sewing Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  4. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Virginia Metalcrafters, Inc.

    387 F.2d 379 (4th Cir. 1967)

    No. 11270. Argued November 10, 1967. Decided December 6, 1967. Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Asa Ambrister, on brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before us upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.

    379 F.2d 958 (4th Cir. 1967)

    No. 11091. Argued May 3, 1967. Decided June 2, 1967. Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Robert C. Lanquist, Jacksonville, Fla. (Hamilton Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges. CRAVEN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order