ยง

Continental Motors, Inc.

145 N.L.R.B. 1075 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Continental Motors, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of ยง 8(a)(1).

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Incorporated

    274 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 61 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 5 Cir., 274 F.2d 381, the unit consisted of 332 employees of which 167 constituted a majority.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Fiore Brothers Oil Company

    317 F.2d 710 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times
    In Fiore Brothers Oil Company, supra, a non-supervisory employee, son-in-law of the company president, solicited authorization cards for the assisted union during working time, a supervisor arranging a meeting with an employee to facilitate solicitation.

  6. Mount Hope Finishing v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    211 F.2d 365 (4th Cir. 1954)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 6666, 6690. Argued January 5, 1954. Decided March 15, 1954. Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N.C. (Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., Walter G. Powers, Taunton, Mass., C.E. Rhetts and Charles E. Hewes, Washington, D.C., on brief), for the companies and individuals. Owsley Vose, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mary E. Williamson, Attorney, National

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gala-Mo Arts

    232 F.2d 102 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 7 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gala-Mo Arts, Inc., 8 Cir., 232 F.2d 102, this court refused to uphold the Board's finding of a discriminatory discharge in violation of the Act.