§

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

361 N.L.R.B. 944 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

11 Cited authorities

  1. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 267 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 29 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

  5. Colgate Co. v. Labor Board

    338 U.S. 355 (1949)   Cited 36 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good

  6. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 1093 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 03-3627, 03-3863. Submitted: December 15, 2004. Filed: March 14, 2005. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. J. Richard Hammett, argued, Houston, TX (Laurence E. Stuart and Liquita Lewis Thompson, on the brief), for petitioner/cross-respondent. Philip A. Hostak, argued, Washington DC (Charles Donnelly and Michael H. Carlin, on the NLRB brief), for respondent/cross-petitioner. D.P. Marshall Jr., argued, Jonesboro, AR, for Intervenor UFCW Local 1000. Before MELLOY, BRIGHT, and BOWMAN

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Heck's Inc.

    386 F.2d 317 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Heck's, Inc., 386 F.2d 317, 322 (4th Cir. 1967), the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals explained the rationale behind not allowing "supervisors" to solicit signatures on union authorization cards.

  9. W. W. Grainger, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-1532. Argued December 7, 1977. Decided August 15, 1978. Charles C. Jackson, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge William J. Campbell of the Northern District of Illinois is sitting by designation. WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. W. W. Grainger, Inc., has petitioned to review

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Appleton Electric Company

    296 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Disagreeing over Board's authority to disregard accretion clauses