§

Computer Sceiences-Technicolor Associates

236 N.L.R.B. 266 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
Computer Sceiences-Technicolor Associates

7 Cited authorities

  1. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    466 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 157 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to enforce Board order giving retroactive effect to rule newly announced in adjudication

  2. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  3. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  4. Teamsters Local U. 769 v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 1385 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 19 times

    No. 75-1250. Argued January 13, 1976. Decided April 8, 1976. Rehearing Denied May 13, 1976. Seymour A. Gopman, North Miami Beach, Fla., for petitioner. William T. Coleman, Jr., Miami, Fla., was on the brief for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John C. Miller, Acting Gen. Counsel and John S. Irving, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for respondent. Jesse S. Hogg, Coral Gables, Fla., with whom W. Reynolds

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Washington Manor, Inc.

    519 F.2d 750 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Washington Manor, Inc., 519 F.2d 750, 753 (6th Cir. 1975), this court stated that "[a] high turnover of employees unaccompanied by objective evidence that new employees do not support the union is no evidence of loss of majority status by the union."

  6. N.L.R.B v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn

    535 F.2d 1387 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 1 times
    In Roman Catholic, the NLRB brought charges of unfair labor practices against, inter alia, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn ("Roman Catholic") for failing to recognize and bargain with the lay teachers of St. Leo's School, which was one of 185-190 parish-operated primary schools in the Diocese of Brooklyn. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and St. Leo's Parish, and Lay Faculty Ass'n, 221 N.L.R.B. 831, 1975 WL 6503 at *3 (Nov. 26, 1975).

  7. Boren Clay Products Company v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 385 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 1 times
    In Boren Clay, the employer made "decidedly coercive" statements to its employees and withdrew recognition even though it knew the union enjoyed majority support.