§

Complainant v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.

0120120628 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 20, 2014)
Complainant v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,628 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  2. Loeb v. Textron, Inc.

    600 F.2d 1003 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 720 times
    Denying any such requirement

  3. Day v. Mathews

    530 F.2d 1083 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 101 times
    In Day v. Mathews, 530 F.2d 1083 (D.C. Cir. 1976), there was conceded proof that the Department of Health, Education and Welfare had treated Mr. Day's applications for promotion in discriminatory fashion.

  4. Arnold v. United States Postal Service

    649 F. Supp. 676 (D.D.C. 1986)   Cited 7 times

    Civ. A. Nos. 85-2571, 86-2291. December 9, 1986. David R. Addis, Joseph E. Kolick, Jr. and Ellen M. Athas of Dickstein, Shapiro Morin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Stuart H. Newberger, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Anthony W. DuComb, U.S. Postal Service, Office of Labor Law, Washington, D.C., for defendant. CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, plaintiffs' cross motion

  5. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,021 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"