§

Community Market, Inc.

179 N.L.R.B. 4 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Community Market, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

    381 U.S. 676 (1965)   Cited 242 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  4. A.H. BELO CORPORATION

    411 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    Deciding that the employer engaged in dilatory tactics in “causing negotiations to drag out over a year ... delay[ing] negotiations two months in order to reply to the union's original proposal, and when it did, counter[ing] with a sketchy four page paper”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Spun-Jee Corporation

    385 F.2d 379 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Spun-Jee Corporation, 385 F.2d 379 (2d Cir.), it was found that the union was clearly put on notice of the intended shutdown of the plant and its removal to a different state and that the union had thus waived its right to bargain.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Dover Tavern Owners' Association

    412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 13 times

    No. 17546. Argued May 9, 1969. Decided June 11, 1969. Joseph Yablonski, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Milford Salny, Netcong, N.J., for respondents. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on a petition for enforcement of the

  8. Retail Clerks Union, No. 1550 v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17726. Argued November 27, 1963. Decided January 23, 1964. Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Russell Specter, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Strong

    386 F.2d 929 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times
    Approving trial examiner's finding that union representative's failure to tell employer that he was bound by master contract was not a waiver of the employer's purported withdrawal

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company

    281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September