§
Comau, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    454 U.S. 404 (1982)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

  2. Alwin Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    192 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the striking employees' motivation for striking is central to a finding of an unfair labor practice strike

  3. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 21 times
    Contrasting lawfully speeding up a long-planned operational change due to union activity, with unlawfully "suddenly decid[ing] to find a way to cut back ... to spite the Union"

  4. Hawaiian Paradise Park Corp. v. Friendly Broadcasting Co.

    414 F.2d 750 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 60 times
    Applying Hawaii law

  5. Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 30 times
    Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hardesty Co., Inc.

    308 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that hardline bargaining positions can be evidence that an employer "had no intention of reaching an agreement"

  7. Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B

    73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

  8. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    131 F.3d 1026 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agencies are entitled to deviate from reasoning used in prior decisions

  9. Bryant Stratton Bus. v. National Labor rel

    140 F.3d 169 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that the employer did not violate the Act where its required use of a sign-in board was a "reaffirmation of its previous policy and not a change in the employee's terms and conditions of employment of unit employees"

  10. AMF Bowling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    63 F.3d 1293 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 9 times
    Explaining that an employer "may impose its own terms and conditions of employment unilaterally" after the lawful declaration of an impasse