§

Columbia College Chicago

360 N.L.R.B. 1116 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Columbia College Chicago

12 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 415 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 267 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  6. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  7. Int'l. Broth., Local 21 v. N.L.R.B

    563 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 4 times

    No. 07-72750. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2009. Filed April 20, 2009. Gilbert A. Cornfield, Cornfield and Feldman, Chicago, IL, for the petitioner. Robert J. Englehart and Daniel A. Blitz, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the respondent. Michael F. McGahan and Donald Krueger, Epstein Becker Green, P.C., New York, NY; Joseph D. Miller, Epstein Becker Green, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for the intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pan American Grain Co., Inc.

    432 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that the court did not "understand the [NLRB's] rationale" and that while the Board's "result may or may not be sound, . . . until we understand its basis, we cannot effectively review it"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Power Co.

    531 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1661. April 22, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Bert Bisgyer, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, Chief District Judge. The Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, Chief District Judge, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,418 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  12. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,304 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355