§

Colt Industries, Inc.

228 N.L.R.B. 723 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Colt Industries, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  4. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  7. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Pyne Molding Corp

    226 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 25 times

    No. 84, Docket 23635. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided October 28, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Arnold Ordman and James A. Ryan, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Morgan P. Ames, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. W.H.F. Millar, Waynesville, N.C., of counsel. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. This petition to enforce

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical Co.

    420 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times

    No. 27714. December 22, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, NLRB, Douglas L. Leslie, Atty., Washington, D.C., Elmer P. Davis, Director, Region 16, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., for petitioner. J.H. Hanes, Wayne Hancock, Midland, Mich., Max D. Rizley, Tulsa, Okla., Karl H. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, THORNBERRY and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen

    188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10374. Argued March 6, 1951. Filed April 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Fannie M. Boyls, and Samuel M. Singer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Irving Herman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Conrad A. Falvello, Hazelton, Pa., for respondent. Rocco C. Falvello, Hazleton, Pa., on the brief, for respondent-appellee. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN