§

Coal Creek Coal Co.

97 N.L.R.B. 14 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Coal Creek Coal Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  3. Labor Board v. Newport News Co.

    308 U.S. 241 (1939)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding finding of domination where company determined structure of organization and could choose whether to adopt recommendations

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baldwin L. Works

    128 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 60 times
    Modifying and enforced an order by the Board

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen

    188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10374. Argued March 6, 1951. Filed April 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Fannie M. Boyls, and Samuel M. Singer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Irving Herman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Conrad A. Falvello, Hazelton, Pa., for respondent. Rocco C. Falvello, Hazleton, Pa., on the brief, for respondent-appellee. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN

  6. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941)   Cited 33 times

    Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order

  7. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    112 F.2d 657 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 34 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 657, 660, a disestablishment order was sustained in a much weaker case than the present.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Augusta Chemical Co.

    187 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13359. February 13, 1951. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D.C., for petitioner. W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rath Packing Co.

    123 F.2d 684 (8th Cir. 1941)   Cited 12 times
    In 123 F.2d 684, on subsequent application of the Board for a contempt order and the response made thereto, we appointed a special master to take testimony and report the facts.

  10. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment