Claudia Ramirez, Complainant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,619 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,622 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
  3. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,092 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  4. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,522 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims
  5. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,288 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."
  6. Section 1604.11 - Sexual harassment

    29 C.F.R. § 1604.11   Cited 954 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding employers liable for co-worker harassment if "the employer (or its agents or supervisory employees) knows or should have known of the conduct, unless it can show that it took immediate and appropriate corrective action"
  7. Section 1614.108 - Investigation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.108   Cited 179 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing inquisitorial nature of investigation process
  8. Section 720.901 - Equal opportunity without regard to politics or marital status

    5 C.F.R. § 720.901   Cited 2 times

    (a)In appointments and position changes. In determining the merit and fitness of a person for competitive appointment or appointment by noncompetitive action to a position in the competitive service, an appointing officer shall not discriminate on the basis of the person's political affiliations, except when required by statute, or on the basis of marital status (b)In adverse actions and termination of probationers. An agency may not take an adverse action against an employee covered by part 752