§

Churchill'S Supermarkets, Inc.

285 N.L.R.B. 138 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Churchill'S Supermarkets, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  4. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  5. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"

  6. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  7. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  8. Automated Business Systems v. N.L.R.B

    497 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 29 times
    Holding a bargaining order is appropriate where at one point the union had a majority but employer misconduct undermined majority strength and impeded the election process

  9. Bandag, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    583 F.2d 765 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 21 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, threatened to curtail plant expansion or close the plant, terminated an employee who was leading the unionization efforts, and promised a wage increase if the union lost

  10. Exchange Bank v. N.L.R.B

    732 F.2d 60 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 82-1807, 82-1933. Argued October 7, 1983. Decided April 16, 1984. Wells T. Lovett (argued), Lovett, Lamar Hutchinson, Owensboro, Ky., for petitioner. Michael Fox (argued), Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT, Circuit Judge, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge, and SPIEGEL, District Judge. The Honorable S. Arthur Spiegel, United States District Court Judge for the Southern

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,862 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions