§

Christian Aabye et al.

12563421 - (D) (P.T.A.B. Sep. 30, 2019)
Christian Aabye et al.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Vizio v. Intl, Trade Comm

    605 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the preamble phrase "apparatus for decoding" in a product claim was "properly construed as a claim limitation, and not merely a statement of purpose or intended use for the invention, because 'decoding' [was] the essence or a fundamental characteristic of the claimed invention."

  2. In re Jasinski

    508 F. App'x 950 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    2012-1482 02-15-2013 IN RE ERIC JASINSKI, MICHAEL RICHARD OUELLETTE, AND JEREMY PAUL ROWLAND, Appellants. ANTHONY P. NG, Yufell Isidore Ng Russell, PLLC, of Austin, Texas, argued for appellants. MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark, Office, of Alexandria, Virginia. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor MOOORE NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United

  3. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,124 times   478 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  4. Section 6 - Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 186 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Giving the Director authority to designate "at least 3 members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" to review "[e]ach appeal, derivation proceeding, post-grant review, and inter partes review"

  5. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622