§

Chevron Mining, Inc. f/k/a The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company

355 N.L.R.B. 1210 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Chevron Mining, Inc. f/k/a The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Boys Markets v. Clerks Union

    398 U.S. 235 (1970)   Cited 856 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements

  3. Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers

    414 U.S. 368 (1974)   Cited 369 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  5. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  7. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  9. Reno Hilton Resorts v. N.L.R.B

    196 F.3d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 23 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the decision to contract out is suspect" where it "came on the heels of heavy union activity" and the employer knew of the purported rationale for its subcontracting decision long before it implemented that decision

  10. Local 702, I.B.E.W. v. N.L.R.B

    215 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 99-1137, 99-1139 Argued January 19, 2000 Decided May 9, 2000 On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Marilyn S. Teitelbaum argued the cause for the petitioners in Nos. 99-1137 and 99-1139. Stacey A. Meyers was on brief for Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, the petitioner in No. 99-1137. Cary Hammond and Greg A. Campbell were on brief for petitioner International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148, AFL-CIO in No. 99-1139