Champlin Refining Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 168 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.
  2. Virginia Elec. Power v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    115 F.2d 414 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 19 times
    In Virginia Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 115 F.2d 414, we rejected the similar claim of the employer that its gas department should be regarded as purely local and separate from its interstate electric operations, and we held that wage controversies or unfair labor practices in one department of such a business would have repercussions in other departments, and that disputes affecting the interstate commerce in which the company was engaged would be avoided only if the rights of all the employees were properly safeguarded.
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.

    132 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1942)   Cited 5 times

    No. 10031. December 11, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition of National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of cease and desist order directed against Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, Clemons Branch, predicated on allegedly discriminatory discharge of two employees of the latter. Order enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen., Counsel, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Hilda D. Shea, Thomas E. Shroyer, and