§

Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC

368 NLRB No. 35 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
Challenge Mfg. Company, LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  5. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  6. National Labor Rels. Board v. Grapetree Shores

    451 F. App'x 143 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 3 times

    No. 10-4569 No. 10-4683 No. 11-1564 No. 11-1742 11-16-2011 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. GRAPETREE SHORES, INC. d/b/a DIVI CARINA BAY RESORT Respondent/Cross-Petitioner POLLAK NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Petition for Review and Application for Enforcement of Orders of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB Nos. 24-CA-11101, 24-CA-10700) Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) October 26, 2011 Before: SLOVITER, GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges, and , District Judge Honorable

  7. N.L.R.B. v. American Dir. Boring

    383 F. App'x 594 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1 times

    No. 09-1194. Submitted: December 17, 2009. Filed: June 24, 2010. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Kellie Isbell, Meredith Jason, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Ralph P. Tremain, National Labor Relations Board, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner. Christopher Grant, Schuchat Cook, St. Louis, MO, for Intervenor. Bryan M. Kaemmerer, Michael E. Kaemmerer, McCarthy Leonard, Chester-field, MO, for Respondent

  8. LB B v. N.L.R.B

    232 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 06-1537, 06-1583, 06-1673. Argued: March 13, 2007. Decided: May 11, 2007. On Petitions for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (29-CA-25511; 29-CA-25668; 29-CA-25762; 29-CA-25777; 29-CA-25779). ARGUED: Jennifer McDougal Miller, Wyrick, Robbins, Yates Ponton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for LB B Associates, Incorporated. Philip Adam Hostak, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Marty