13 Cited authorities
Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass
404 U.S. 157 (1971) Cited 630 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 268 times 16 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 263 times 4 Legal AnalysesApproving "discovery-type standard"
Teachers Coll. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
902 F.3d 296 (D.C. Cir. 2018) Cited 4 timesNo. 17-1151 C/w 17-1184 09-04-2018 TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Local 2110, Technical, Office and Professional Union, United Auto Workers AFL-CIO, Intervenor Matthew J. Frankel, Boston, MA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kenneth J. Nichols, Washington, DC, and Tara E. Daub, Jericho, NY. David Casserly, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were
San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 50 timesRejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leiferman Enterprises, LLC
649 F.3d 873 (8th Cir. 2011) Cited 2 timesNos. 10–2801 10–2978. 2011-08-12 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner/Cross–Respondent,v.LEIFERMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, doing business as Harmon Auto Glass and its successor Auto Glass Repair and Windshield Replacement Service, Inc., Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. David A. Seid, argued, Usha Dheenan, attorney with the NLRB, on the brief, Washington, DC, for petitioner NLRB.Gregory M. Erickson, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. David A. Seid
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 timesNoting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
East Tennessee Baptist Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
6 F.3d 1139 (6th Cir. 1993) Cited 13 timesNos. 91-6171, 91-6294. Argued August 6, 1992. Decided October 7, 1993. E.H. Rayson, John B. Rayson (argued and briefed), Warren L. Gooch, Kramer, Rayson, McVeigh, Leake Rodgers, Knoxville, TN, for East Tennessee Baptist Hosp. Collis Suzanne Stocking (briefed), Magdalena Revuelta (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Martin M. Arlook, Director, N.L.R.B., Region 10, Atlanta, GA, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court Branch, Washington
Walter N. Yoder Sons v. N.L.R.B
754 F.2d 531 (4th Cir. 1985) Cited 16 timesCrediting union president’s testimony that another union official "reported to [him] that Yoder employees had told" the official about integrated operations with an alleged non-union alter-ego company
Florida Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B
601 F.2d 125 (4th Cir. 1979) Cited 14 timesHolding substantial evidence did not support the Board finding of discriminatory discharge where there was no evidence that the company ever applied any penalty less severe than discharge in any case involving similar or more serious misconduct on the part of another employee
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,084 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
Section 2101 - Definitions; exclusions from definition of loss of employment
29 U.S.C. § 2101 Cited 825 times 39 Legal AnalysesDefining "mass layoff" as "a reduction in force" that is not the result of a plant closing and "(B) results in an employment loss"