§

Celanese Corp. of America

95 N.L.R.B. 664 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Celanese Corp. of America

24 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

  4. Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.

    309 U.S. 206 (1940)   Cited 219 times
    Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

  5. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  7. Superior Engraving Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 44 times
    In Superior Engraving Co. v. National LaborRel. Bd., 183 F.2d 783, 789 (7 Cir. 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 490, 95 L.Ed. 671 (1951), the court recently declined to apply Sohn v. Waterson, supra, to an amendatory provision in the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), that "no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board."

  8. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    93 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1938)   Cited 67 times

    No. 4229. January 4, 1938. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Appalachian Electric Power Company to review a cease and desist order entered by the National Labor Relations Board in a proceeding commenced before the Board by a complaint filed in behalf of the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers, Local Union No. 906, charging that the Appalachian Electric Power Company had engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce

  9. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  10. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

    133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent