§
CBRE, INC.

6 Cited authorities

  1. EPIC Sys. Corp. v. Lewis

    138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)   Cited 950 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Concepcion , "courts may not allow a contract defense to reshape traditional individualized arbitration" and "a rule seeking to declare individualized arbitration proceedings off limits" is preempted by the FAA

  2. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  3. Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    824 F.3d 772 (8th Cir. 2016)   Cited 40 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement providing that "[a]ll claims, disputes or controversies ... shall be decided by [individual] arbitration" violated Section 8 given its "breadth and generality" and "the absence of any limits to this broadly worded provision"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alt. Entm't, Inc.

    858 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2017)   Cited 33 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining that "[m]andatory arbitration provisions that permit only individual arbitration of employment-related claims are illegal pursuant to the NLRA and unenforceable pursuant to the FAA's saving clause"

  5. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,090 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

  6. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 11,129 times   119 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"