Castle Hill Health Center

27 Cited authorities

Mine Workers v. Pennington
381 U.S. 657 (1965) Cited 1,634 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that immunity extends to petitioning conduct “either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme”
Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass
404 U.S. 157 (1971) Cited 630 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 708 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.
453 U.S. 322 (1981) Cited 365 times
Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 263 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
454 U.S. 404 (1982) Cited 116 times
Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Chicago Typographical v. Chicago Sun-Times
935 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 123 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"
Daniels & Kennedy, Inc. v. A/S Inger
375 U.S. 834 (1963) Cited 82 times
Holding shipowner's settlement of longshoreman's injury claim reasonable and reversing judgment denying indemnity
Certiorari Denied
534 U.S. 818 (2001) Cited 16 times
Concluding employer entitled to judgment as matter of law where employee offered no evidence of number and types of positions available in local job market that did not require heavy or medium lifting

Castle Hill Health Center

27 Cited authorities

Holding that immunity extends to petitioning conduct “either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme”

Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"

Holding shipowner's settlement of longshoreman's injury claim reasonable and reversing judgment denying indemnity

Concluding employer entitled to judgment as matter of law where employee offered no evidence of number and types of positions available in local job market that did not require heavy or medium lifting