§

California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory

360 N.L.R.B. 504 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory

9 Cited authorities

  1. National Aeronautics v. Nelson

    562 U.S. 134 (2011)   Cited 295 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding government employer seeking employees’ history of drug use and treatment as reasonably connected to its interests

  2. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 305 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  3. Letter Carriers v. Austin

    418 U.S. 264 (1974)   Cited 609 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

  4. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 729 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

  5. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  6. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  7. Jolliff v. N.L.R.B

    513 F.3d 600 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 24 times
    In Jolliff, we canvassed the tests and approaches of other circuits and created a framework for ascertaining whether a defamatory meaning can be gleaned from the allegedly defamatory statement.

  8. Guard Publishing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    571 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing an employer's challenge to only the unfavorable portions of an NLRB ruling

  9. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”