Brophy Engraving Co.
3 Cited authorities
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines
303 U.S. 261 (1938) Cited 264 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
Progressive Mine Wkrs. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
187 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 14 timesNo. 10185. Heard January 12, 1951. Decided January 31, 1951. As Amended March 20, 1951. G. William Horsley, Springfield, Ill., for the Labor Union. Louis J. Portner, St. Louis, Mo., for Randolph Corporation. David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and George L. Powell, National Labor Relations Board, George J. Bott, General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Gerald F. Krassa, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and KERNER and