§
Borden, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 730 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 325 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  4. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 456 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  5. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins.

    167 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Supporting employees' entitlement to write a letter complaining about supervisor

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.

    315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.

  10. Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 20791-21332. October 2, 1964. Rehearings Denied December 21, 1964. Mark L. Taliaferro, C.V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala. (Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for petitioner, Deaton Truck Line, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., David R. Richards, Dallas, Tex., for Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers, Local Union