13 Cited authorities
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 494 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Labor Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.
336 U.S. 226 (1949) Cited 46 timesIn NLRB v. Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S. 226, 232-33, 69 S.Ct. 541, 544, 93 L.Ed. 638 (1949), the Court declined to enforce an order requiring an employer to make its meeting hall available to a union; the Board might legitimately bar discrimination against unions, the Court said, but could not require the employer to prefer unions over other potential users.
Superior Engraving Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950) Cited 44 timesIn Superior Engraving Co. v. National LaborRel. Bd., 183 F.2d 783, 789 (7 Cir. 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 490, 95 L.Ed. 671 (1951), the court recently declined to apply Sohn v. Waterson, supra, to an amendatory provision in the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), that "no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Mylan-Sparta Co.
166 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 29 timesIn Mylan-Sparta, the Board found the employer in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) when it discharged a number of employees for engaging in union activities.
F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 36 timesNo. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. May Dept. Stores
154 F.2d 533 (8th Cir. 1946) Cited 26 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. May Dept. Stores Co., 154 F.2d 533 (8th Cir. 1946), the Court approved the Board's order banning solicitation at all times on the selling floor of the retail store, including during the employees' lunch hour.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Furnace Co.
158 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1946) Cited 23 timesNo. 9074. December 4, 1946. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against the American Furnace Company, respondent, for enforcement of the petitioner's order directing respondent to cease and desist from interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of right of self-organization, from interfering with and dominating the American Furnace Labor Organization, or any other labor
National Labor Rel. Board v. Clark Bros. Co.
163 F.2d 373 (2d Cir. 1947) Cited 16 timesNo. 268, Docket 20375. July 29, 1947. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directing Clark Bros. Company, Inc., to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices. Enforcement granted. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, General Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Leonard Appel and Mozart G. Ratner, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Maurice F. Hanning and McAfee, Grossman, Taplin, Hanning, Newcomer
National L. Rel. Bd. v. Winona Knitting Mills
163 F.2d 156 (8th Cir. 1947) Cited 8 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Winona Knitting Mills, Inc., 8 Cir., 163 F.2d 156, the Court considered a factual situation similar to that here.