§

Bluefield Hospital Company, LLC, d/b/a Bluefield Regional Medical Center

361 N.L.R.B. 1389 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Bluefield Hospital Company, LLC, d/b/a Bluefield Regional Medical Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 268 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Springfield Hosp

    899 F.2d 1305 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 11 times

    No. 177, Docket 89-4055. Argued September 29, 1989. Decided March 26, 1990. Steven Goldstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Linda Dreeben, Supervisory Atty., Joseph E. Desio, Acting General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., of counsel), for petitioner. Brian E. Hayes, Springfield, Mass. (Ralph F. Abbott, James M. Trono, Skoler, Abbott, Hayes and Presser, of counsel), for respondent. John M. Creane, Milford, Conn., for

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  6. Section 103.30 - Appropriate bargaining units in the health care industry

    29 C.F.R. § 103.30   Cited 13 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a) This portion of the rule shall be applicable to acute care hospitals, as defined in paragraph (f) of this section: Except in extraordinary circumstances and in circumstances in which there are existing non-conforming units, the following shall be appropriate units, and the only appropriate units, for petitions filed pursuant to section 9(c)(1)(A)(i) or 9(c)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, except that, if sought by labor organizations, various combinations of units may also